Reasonable Doubt

Convicted of murder and sentenced to death, Gary Drinkard spent six years on Alabama's death row before a team of accomplished attorneys took up his case and successfully defended him in a retrial. Twenty years after the murder, his attorneys, the DA, and the police investigator in charge of the case provide contrasting views of Drinkard and the ideologies and integrity of the system that determined his fate. In a system that presumes innocence and requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict, is justice really upheld?